Here's another fine proof that the Examiner is not a dowsing device per se. Take a dowsing rod or rods or any other dowsing device and detect a sample of say gold. Tape a headband made from  aluminium foil right round your head.. You will find a point where the foil will null any attempt to detect you make with the rods etc.  Now try the Examiner with the foil taped to the same place. There will be no problem detecting as per normal. You may need to tune the controller. The points on the forehead and above the ears are held to be important in dowsing as you can see. The Examiner is not 'foiled' by the barrier and so does not appear to work with points associated with dowsing. It uses micromagnetics and frequencies with no user input whatsoever. Dowsing uses some of these but it is an esoteric interpretation and hence nothing to do with the user-independent  Examiner.

Over four years of reading every argument advanced by the skeptics re long range locators their only argument has been that it is dowsing and hence within the natural grasp of users without having to pay for these units. There are dozens of ways to prove this is in fact completely incorrect. A rod may move in the hand of the user and appear to detect , but this is using the body aerial in a primitive way and not a professionally tested and accurate device such as the Examiner. It would cost twice as much to get tuition to use an L rod to even find water properly as the price of the Examiner, even if you could find a dowsing instructor. This is given you are one of the few or many that claim they can.