VIDEO TUTOR

TUNING EXAMINER

Use Anubis and antenna as shown in clip (arrow/pause/stop) to sharpen lock to sample with Examiner. One section out seems ideal for most applications but you can experiment with lengths. In wind it helps to place all sections in the one extended.

Once set you will locate the substance tuned to by sweeping from side to side slowly until the antenna aligns like a compass in a particular direction. The depth test can also be conducted with the Rodette.

Either unit can perform as a bot, allowing you to follow it''s turning to the target. When the antenna points back the way you came...you are directly above the target.

We told you it was user-friendly.

.......

A Rodette III .in the same way as the Examiner, will whirl like a helicopter in the hands of a passenger as it passes a gold reef. These reefs, common in gold country are simply gold bearing strata passing beneath the road. As the forward momentum of the car passes the reef the antenna continues to pull back to the reef then forward off the reef and back again due to the centrifugal force. This action can get quite animated depending on the reef structure and can reach 3 times as fast as the speed in the clip.

Click to view clip whirligig.swf (Quicktime Player)

(No the hand is not helping it. It was a bumpy road.)

See Next Page for another illustration of this effect.

Letter From Ben

Hi Ranger, I've been recovering from the 10 hour drive home from Colorado. Whew! I tried the Examiner in the mining districts between elevations of from 7,700 to 12,800 feet. I got lots of long range hits, but mainly worked the ore dumps of mines that I could fourwheel into. My best responses came at close range using the new frequency settings with 2 sections of aerial extended. At the first mine, I only had one hit. I boxed it in and went over the spot with the detector. I immediately had a loud signal. I dug up a small piece of black ore. Not what I expected, but, knowing that the geology of Colorado is different than my experiences elsewhere, I saved the piece. The next day at a mine near a ghost town, the Examiner gave me strong hits at several places atop and on the sides of the dump. I boxed them in, marked them, and detected 6 pieces of that same strange black ore. They really scream in the headphones of my White's GMT! Back in town, I got hold of a book on gold occurrences of Colorado that mentioned native gold in polymetallic veins in a host rock of Tertiary andesitic lava/tuff. Okay, now I scrubbed the pieces and looked at them with my jeweler's loupe. Native gold visible on the pieces! On the way back from the Pass, I talked the family into stopping to hunt at a place where the river intersects that gulch I told you about. Same story, I found a couple of pieces of the mystery ore. My best day was my last day there. My son and I fourwheeled into an old mine in the mountainous area. Just for fun, I set the Examiner to the long frequency with only one length of aerial showing. I received many, many, many, many hits. I recovered almost 100 pieces of ore! My son found about thirty. I will send pics after I crush and pan out the material. All I can say is wow! All for now, Ben

BEWARE THE GOLD PAINT!

Since most gold paint used on toys, ceramics and other items is 24k gold, it pays to be aware of this in the field. Below are a few shots of gold paint found from 30 feet using the Examiner and another unit we're testing. The gold paint is obvious. The matrix tests as ceramics. Probably the edge of a plate.

The new sizing dial of the Examiner allows you avoid this by setting to a larger size.

All pics 200x

TEXAS PROJECT 2008

Recently we loaned a treasurehunter an Examiner to see whether he could detect a cache he had researched. This was his most recent email.

Hi RT

I had a great day and great time....but no gold. I've confirmed without a shadow of a doubt what gold was buried there long ago...was sought out and found already. Maybe by the robber's family (handed out a secret map or secret information out of the jail to their family members). So that "hanging" was not done in vain and benefited their family.

[See Attached] : I only had "one" really good strong signal all day (was excited)....(but sadly) that signal crossed the river and went on into Oklahoma. I found the crossing "smaller" signals around where I dug two 30" holes...(confirmed by my metal detector too)....I really thought I was onto something....but the sand appear to be saturated in minerals...iron and such....no coinage.

I'm pretty sure...one one the weak signals (north-west) was the feeder tank I found after....and I don't know about the other weak signal...it too was in the direction of another feeder tank...pretty close anyway. Saw 7 cardinals and in the morning flushed out 5 white tail deer jumping and flying into the air...was a nice sight.

The other hot spots....we thought were good spots....nothing. (see x's)

I KNOW what the draw and pull feels like on 3.5 ounces of gold....I'm telling you, even the strongest signal I had felt like 1 ounce of gold. If there were 500/600 ounces of gold out there...should have had a super strong pull. Conclusion, Gold has been found already and pulled out silently...probably in 1895 to 1900 when the stories were hot in the local taverns and people knew exactly where the men travelled in detail.

I'll be returning you Examinator , here shortly....what is your current return address there?
I don't think I'll be running into another "old tale of lost gold"....but I might research for another in the days before I return your detector. Proudly your detector is in "mint" condition....you'll never know it's been around Texas and journeyed so far in the deep brush. Few cuts on my legs (through jeans), sharp everything out there.

The Trip was a success in that I fullfilled the mission...gaining knowledge that the gold does not exist out there...unless, there we're crooked federal marshals that took the gold to oklahoma. Don't have any idea what the oklahoma side signal was...but I'm not that curious...practically impossible to get to that area.

Ok fellas, thanks for your support and for the loaned detector...we all gave it our best which is better than not attempting (being a sofa slug)...it was great out there...walked 7 miles today...3 miles in 3 miles out...and maybe one mile laterally to do confirmations. I spent most of the time with the Examinator...it did find what my metal detector found too...crossing areas. That in itself is a great test. Take care, xxxxx.

........

This was a great idea and exercise which we had a deal of fun with. We thank the detectorist for his input.

In some areas if a target appears and is down some feet, it may in fact be residual in some areas and hence absent.. There are ways to test whether it has been removed. This applies equally to natural and manmade gold.

Just ask us about this at agentrt@bigpond.com RT

What the Rodette III has reacted to from the vehicle

A tranquil stream The Examiner finds a lock Shovel and pan

Washing the load Flecks of gold Diamond tail

A reef has fed a stream and initial panning has yielded evidence. Next time we will get closer to the source.

SOUTH AMERICAN EXAMINER USER CONDUCTS THOROUGH EXPERIMENT AND PRESENTS HIS FINDINGS

RT EXAMINER REPORT PART 1

This is not a commercial advertisement in any way. Only an honest report written by a user who wants to contribute to the possible subject of dowsing related phenomena which to this date, is not completely understood yet.

This two-part report intends to make a deep analysis of the Rangertell Examiner Long Range Locator and the possible found unknown energies related aspects derived from its working principle.

I plan to post an honest and precise report based on my own experiences, so I won’t ‘take sides’ regarding it. Only what I experienced and its referred results are reported.

Unlike a previous report done a few years ago which displayed a dismantled RT Examiner as stated by the author and its electronics were discussed, this report will cover the scientific basis to support or not the theory behind it and the intense and detailed indoor tests to check whether its operative power is indeed what’s advertised. So besides checking the scientific data, part one will deal with indoor experiments and tests with non-buried samples of many types and the Examiner’s reactions.

Part two, to be released only after innumerous outdoor tests, will then aim the actual performance in the field where a ‘real life’ searching and detection will be performed.

Although it’s claimed as an electronic detector, I found much of the dowsing aspects to be present as I hope to demonstrate and a new aspect of this subject emerged to my own surprise as we’ll see later.

The subject of dowsing and detection is so vast that in my opinion proved and accepted conclusions will not be made in the near future. I should point that my only intention writing this report was to contribute and offer one more piece of information so to help us all in the attempt to understand the unknown components present in those kinds of detection.

At last but not least, I would like to thank Anthony from RT, who provided great support in answering all of my questions and sharing some tips and experiences. Although I may not necessarily agree with some of his claims regarding some issues I found, he and RT proved to be an excellent support for the ‘post sale’ customer unlike most of manufacturers who turn their back on you after the sale completion.

**************************************

In the past, this LRL has acquired much controversy and negative feedback from many customers who bought it, although I found a few users in the internet who are happy with it. So after reading the claims of the working principle of the ‘Examiner’ made by Rangertell, I decided to analyze deeply the scientific and electronic principles which could or could not support such evidence. So I decided that if any scientific background would stand up to support the claims, I would get one to check its operation capacity.

The two main electronic and scientific claims which are the ‘heart’ of the theory behind it are: It works employing induction and a resonant circuit. It needs no power to accomplish this.

In order to investigate it further, I turned to the schematics and pictures in Carl Moreland’s report as he stated to have opened one and displayed its circuitry.

To support the first claim about using induction and resonance, two special windings and coil placements were built. It’s claimed to be a Tesla coil based winding, generating what would be a Tesla transformer. The first coil is wrapped around a telescopic antenna with two different windings. One being clockwise and the other anti-clockwise. The other coil is the one which is placed glued in the top cover in ‘curves’ with its copper lead wire protruding out of a hole to supposedly induce to the circuit, the frequencies generated in the calculator. Upon researching Tesla, particularly information on two books: ‘Man out of Time’ by Margaret Cheney and the compilation ‘Fantastic Inventions of Nicola Tesla’, and being aware of Tesla’s concepts myself for sometime, I found enough information to support the first claim. The calculator provides a certain frequency which induces the circuit through the Tesla Coil first stage ⁺and then the induced signal gets amplified tremendously in the second stage creating a resonant signal which is indeed developed logarithmically. This resonant effect created is the so called ‘Schumann’s Resonance’. Since the explanation of this would cause this report to be extremely long, I offer a link to those interested and not familiar with it. http://72.14.207.104/search?q=cache:4bCBv2Gfht0J:www.2012.com.au/SchumannResonance.html+schumann%27s+resonance&hl=pt-BR&gl=br&ct=clnk&cd=4

All of this led me to the confirmation of the second claim about no power required. In fact, very little power in the order of milivolts is enough to make up induction and resonance to the circuit. The diode rectifies the AC employed in the antenna to DC which is consumed through resistance in a repetitive cycle. It seems the concept of the Tesla transformer needs to employ AC at the first stage, as it would turn to be a DC circuit instead, causing the coil to be resistive and pursuing neither Inductive Reactance nor Capacitive Reactance which are inherent to AC circuits and thus crucial to support the theory behind the Examiner. And here the electrolytic capacitor plays a major role, storing the electrostatic charges which feed the coil and return all the unused power back to the source. Unlike a DC circuit where power is totally consumed through resistance and none is returned to the source, in AC circuits due to aspects of capacitive and inductive reactance as stated before, no power is used and all of it is returned to the source. So the claim that no ‘battery’ power is required to the Examiner is true and makes sense.

What also makes sense is the same question I bet hits the minds of a lot of people: Why in the world would LRLs manufacturers sell their devices if they did not work? Maybe the devices can only work partially, but at least for me, It’s very hard to believe a manufacturer would risk his reputation and have his name or company ruined trying to sell scams…But I admit that there’s this possibility. I wanted to see if this would apply to Rangertell.

So after being able to reasonably back up RT’s claims with some evidences found in science and electronics I then headed to the next phase and decided to get one Examiner to perform actual tests and see if practice would support the theory.

The model I received was the Targette-Garvin 7.1.05b. According to RT, a long, long way from the one which is believed as an early prototype showed in Moreland’s report.

The first thing I noticed was how well and neatly assembled the unit looked, very different than the one which was displayed in Moreland’s report. Although it’s claimed to be hand built, it was carefully assembled and well planned. The cover of gray styling, the rubber grip well attached to the handle and the swivel being smooth turning. And a locking system is employed underneath the handle not allowing the handle/grip fall off. No Karce calculator. A scientific solar Hewlett Packard was attached to the circuit box. Also, a ‘stick on’ attached to the gray circuit box displayed: ‘Busbe inside’.

The manual, tutorial video, operation tips, pictures of findings, etc. came inside a CD Rom. After reading the initial part and making sure that it was operative, I proceeded in reading all information provided and storing the frequencies to the calculator.

What I meant ‘making sure it was operative’ was performing a test where I press a certain frequency in the calculator and then touch every object with my other hand making certain that the Examiner turn its antenna direct to the object touched.

And this I could corroborate. The antenna DID move toward the objects touched.

Also interestingly enough was the mentioning of the Schumann resonance in the manual where it says to press a number in the keypad and walk forward to demonstrate it. It is said that the Examiner should rotate like a ‘helicopter’. This was exactly what happened.

The user needs to turn the fine tuning knob to accomplish the strongest movement.

In fact the fine tuning knob is crucial as we’ll see further on.

In sum, I could confirm all the information regarding frequencies related to the substances advertised such as, gold, silver, nickel, iron, copper, water, etc.

The manual says that after entering the corresponding frequency, the user needs to fine tune it until a ‘lock’ is felt. This I could confirm. Although the antenna does move towards the object chosen, when a fine tuning is done, the Examiner acts and feels like a magnet with a much stronger and fast response. It’s a surprising effect and feels like ‘something’ emanating from the object is guiding the antenna…

I then proceeded to the next step. The opening tests.

I placed a sample of every object mentioned away from me at a time and then entered its provided frequency only to see the antenna moving without hesitation towards them. I must add if the corresponding frequency was switched, e.g. using the gold’s frequency for silver would not move the antenna. I also could attest that several frequency variations to a given substance is provided. So for instance in the case of gold there are variations for natural gold, mexican gold, etc. I found the main two provided, apparently worked for me.

Next I placed samples under rocks at distance and went to check if the advertised power of the Examiner about being able to tell before hand the size, distance, depth and shape of the object was true. Actually this is only advertised with the ‘Targette-Garvin’ model. Well it worked as said. I placed my wedding gold ring under a rock. Hit the commands given and the Examiner gave me the following info:

Weight: 2 to 4 grams. It’s 3.8 grams.

Shape : A ring. (other available are coins, bars, spheres, cubes, and drums)

Distance: around 3 meters. It was at 2.75m

Depth: about 6 centimeters. Actually I did not bury it, but the rock over it counts and based on that, the ring was around 7 cm under it.

This is accomplished in one of two ways. The first way is to enter the substance frequency and mark where the antenna is pointing. This is the direction of the detected target. To collect information about it as done above, the user simply enters factory provided functions and numbers in the key pad. If they are wrong, the antenna rejects it, moving to the side. If the numbers are close or exact, the antenna will remain pointing to that direction.

The other way is to sweep the antenna to the sides. When the correct numbers are entered, the antenna will move back to the initial detected direction. If not, it will not move at all or it will move partially, indicating that the numbers entered are far or closer to the Examiner’s detected values.

This I found impressive.

I should point that one must study the manual thoroughly as there are a lot of information to be absorbed.

Next I went to check if the Examiner could tell me where a hidden gold ring was. I put three stones on the ground and asked my wife to place the ring under one of them.

I was successful the first time. Then missed the next two. Then got it right for the next one or two, etc. . Rate of correct detections were of about 60%.

Intriguing… This was the first indication of unknown phenomena involved which led me to research it even more.

Why did it behavior differently upon UNKNOWN samples?

The next test I performed was to turn my back and throw the ring over my shoulders. This might sound a silly thing to do, but I was alone and this could lead to a preliminary experience whether an object in an unknown location could be found. Once the ring was on my backyard, compressed soil, no ground, I started the search looking up, never down in order to possibly not look at the ring. I did it 3 times. The first two, although the Examiner seemed to point to the direction where the ring supposedly was, when I calmly waited for the antenna to stop moving, to lock the object and walk over it till the antenna’s indication that I was over it, guess what? I wasn’t. But it was very close to the spot, about 10 inches to whatever side. I must admit that the best approach in this particular case is as the manual says, to walk in an N-S / E-W pattern. Once you mark the ‘box’ only then you proceed to pinpoint it. I did not do this tough. But I was not successful as I said in determining the center of the object as also this becomes very hard for such a small object. Later I would discover that his was not exactly the case…

But the third time came with a surprise. When I threw the ring on the floor and turned to find it, the Examiner as usual pointed to the specific direction. This time I stopped walking and wanted to check if it really was pointing direct to the ring. I waited for the antenna to get the ‘lock’ and then I looked down. No ring at sight. I rechecked the Examiner. It had the antenna frozen in that particular direction, but no ring at all… I then put it aside thinking to myself how bad I had failed, hoping to find it in a place not shown by the examiner. To my surprise in the space where I was performing the test, about a 20 X 20 feet area, the ring was not found. Would it be that the unknown forces dealt with the Examiner had vanished the ring? Not really… I took the Examiner again, and just like before, it kept pointed to a direction where there was nothing on the ground for the next 20 feet, except for a little bush. I looked at the antenna and it was pointing direct to the bush resembling those hunting dogs who stops and freeze pointing the prey…

I began approaching the bush and at my astonishment, the ring laid there in a way that only a person who could approach the bush from 4 inches would be able to sight it. How in the world could that ring have jumped to that bush? This answer did not mean anything for me that moment as I had a much more important data to think about. The Examiner hit it dead on and I did not trust him. And there’s more. I did not know where the ring was and it detected. This is an important factor. Next test…

I laid the ring on the ground with no reference point this time to check its precision in pinpointing it that is, finding its exact spot. To accomplish centering the object, the manual says to hit a specific key twice for surface targets. I tried first not pressing this key. The examiner detected close but not on the spot. When I did press that key, in fact the detection of the center got much sharper. I must say that the user has to put a drop or tow of oil inside the swivel in order to prevent friction when detecting and to provide a stress-free turning of the antenna.

As the days passed by I did dozens and dozens of tests with it, always exchanging impressions with Anthony at RT. In fact the subject of not getting consistent results, sometimes led me to argue that since the user with his body, plays a major factor in detecting acting as aerial, then if could be considered a dowsing device. Anthony refuted that claim asking me to do a simple test where I would place an aluminum foil headband around my head right above my ears. Placing a gold sample nearby I got a dowsing rod and the rod would not move at all, not picking up the signal line after walking past the sample. Prior to the placement of the headband this did not occur. Next I kept the headband on and using the examiner this time, it did not have any problems pointing to the sample after walking past it. In his opinion, this proved that the Examiner did not suffer from the dowsing aspects and was not dowsing at all.

Well, could be. But it also could be that it did not suffer from this particular dowsing component. What if there were others? How could consistency not be kept sometimes upon detecting with the Examiner?

What mysterious phenomena took place upon detecting unknown objects, when I clearly felt that difficulty increased, unlike when known objects were used?

All of this pointed to a component as the possible cause. The body of the user and his electrical/psychological/biological conditions. Since it worked correctly upon objects which the user knows where it is, the Examiner itself and its electronics and concepts are correct. Every information regarding distance, shape, depth, etc. are displayed correctly.

For instance, so far I have detected from my house, a target at sea at about 1.5 miles away and another at some 12 miles distant. The first one at sea tells me about gold bars and coins weighting 140 Kilograms total, spread in an area of 90 square feet and at 135 feet deep. The more distant target represents gold in several shapes, 12 feet deep, covering an area of 9 square feet and weighting about 1 ton.

Theoretically the examiner may be displaying logical and correct data. The one at sea is at 135 feet deep. The bathymetry of the area seems to support this information. And the other more distant target besides backing up the evidence that the significant weight/mass justify the distance detected, is around 9 to 12 feet deep, indicating that it lies at ground and not at sea. Using google earth I could corroborate both pieces of information regarding the distance of those targets.

But are they really there? Only an expedition to those sites will answer that question.

One thing I should add is that since this device resonates the structure of matter at subatomic levels (provided the frequency is the right one for that matter), micro gold is also detected. A workaround to this is hitting a certain key many times to supposedly avoid those micro particles. I found that a little awkward since by doing this the Examiner’s aerial seemed to move slower than before, but again your mileage may vary…

Part One Conclusions

In my point of view, the Examiner is a device which involves a whole circuit system where the user body plays a major role as an actual circuit part. That is, the user body component is an important part of the whole Examiner conception.

Because of this, I suppose that sometimes there can be inconsistencies in the detection results which apparently are caused by an anomaly of the body field inducing the Examiner.

Since all tests were performed indoors, I don’t know yet how it will react outdoors.

Remember, I tested it with known samples that I knew where they were and I also tested it with known samples which I did not know where they were. But I still did not test it with an unknown sample which I also don’t know where it is. Such as when you start to walk and you don’t know if there’s something around and where it might be…

Still, I cannot explain which kind of body component interacts with the Examiner and sometimes causes this erratic detection at this time. Could be the body’s bio energy, although the mind is not totally discarded by me. Anyway, I could not determine if it’s an unbalancing electric field emanating from the body , or if it’s a type of wave the brain releases when the location of the target is not known thus possibly causing some type of uncertainness about it… Etc. It could be dozens of things regarding the reason to explain such phenomena. I will leave for the readers this kind of discussion due to the more ideas, the higher the probability to find a conclusion.

I found that it’s a bit difficult to locate a small item such a ring in an open area and pin point it. Even with the ‘box’ method, one has to be extremely seasoned with the Examiner to find the exact center, so a regular MD is more than welcome on those situations.

Anyway, the Examiner performs as advertised and the functions the user employs to know about the complementary information such as how deep, far, weight, etc... Do seem to work.

I said it seems to work because I succeeded when known targets were tested. To be sure 100% I will have to actually detect and recover a target.

If someone who reads this report happen to own or intend to buy an Examiner, I really would like to hear what they have to say regarding their impressions upon reading mine.

By doing so, we can hopefully build up some data which might help each other in trying to understand better the Examiner’s conceptions, its issues and the phenomena related to it.

One important thing.

Although I’ve read a lot of angry posts in the past on several forums from users who claimed the Examiner did not work at all, I strongly refute this claim. It does work, pointing to the samples selected.

One reason for those posts to exist might lie in the fact that those people simply ARE NOT ABLE to use the Examiner. I really believe that those people exist. What I’m trying to say is that the Examiner might not work for everybody. For instance, the examiner in my wife’s hands simply does not move at all. So the fact Rangertell gives a 14 day period to try it, is more than fair in my opinion. It allows the user to check if it works for him or not.

Finally, I am open to questions and to discuss ideas which might raise after this report. This is good because we will be exchanging ideas towards the possible explanations about all of that.

Part two of this report where I will take the Examiner in the field will be released in a month or so.

RT Part 2 : The Expedition

After going to a remote place with lots of spiders, snakes, and dangerous felines, terribly hot spot during day, cold as ice at nightS, I am back.

This report will be short as all impressions and description of the examiner are already made in part 1.

OK. I went there to check the examiner detecting gold and diamonds. Let’s talk about gold first.

Complete success in detection. But some issues on some matters. I went to a gold mining region and prior to enter the village, I detected every spot of gold veins which existed there. The miners have some type of scheme which the gold concentrations are found. Although there were several deep holes dug (about 100 feet deep), I could pinpoint every gold concentration known on the scheme and still to be dug. The miners got impressed on how I did it just using a small antenna box with a calculator stuck on top.

Excited on the success, I joined some people who on the following morning would check a story on some gold bars left in a huge old farm inside antique stoves.

Next morning as we were aproaching the place, I entered numbers for rectangular shape (bars) and I got a signal in a particular tuning on the knob. It was miles away. We followed the signal until hours later we ended up in a place close to a dry river. No sign of any stove, but the examiner was pinpointing a particular spot on ground. I checked the depth. 12 meters…. Impossible. No one would hide goldbars at this depth, unless there was a cave beneath my feet.

Which later proved wrong. No cave. So why I got this signal? Tune the knob again and it pointed another direction to gold bars. This time I decided to use autoscan mode to know which directions it would show me gold bars. It indicated 2 more. This time one of the miners recognized the directins and said it should be pointing to the gold veins he knew about. So later on the mining camp, I picked up a rock with gold vein which I had previosly detected and entered the shape for bars to check if it would swing to it. Exactly. Not only it did as rectangle input as cube also. An then coins (circular shape) Another rock had a circular spot of gold on it. The round spot became a gold coin to the examiner.

Far enough I thought. Gold veins are rectangular and gold spots bellow are circular. What can it do?

I already contacted RT to tell this and ask for a possible solution to avoid mistaking natural gold veins and spots for gold bars and coins.

Despite that I trully can attest the Examiner succeded in locating gold. Although I could not locate a man buried treasure, the detection of gold proved correct and precise.

Next. Diamonds. I went to a region of diamond mining. This region was exaustively explored and a large amount of diamonds have already been taken . The place is not full of people anymore as it did in the past. Only one mining team was there.

As always, I did not know the direction of the mining prior the detection. I asked to not to be told. I set the examiner for diamonds and in a matter of seconds it swinged to a certain direction and stops. Direction correct.

When the news about a device which could supposedly locate diamonds hit their ears, they almost collapsed of curiosity and excitement.

There I went with the little antenna moving like a hound dog.

Diamonds are found attached to rocks deeply close to the river bed or in the river bed itself as loosen small rocks. Knowing about this, I set the exainer to only locate at half a foot deep, in the hopes it would take me to the river. I got a swing from about a quarter mile from the river bed. It ended as I expected… In the river bed. When the center was determined, the miners start to gather the sand, rocks, etc. inside panning sieves. Carefully picking ‘suspicious’ rocks, finally the examiner swings to a particular one. Everybody gets excited as it looked like a ‘yellow’ diamond which looks opaque. A miner even said it looked like a real diamond.

One thing tough.. I set for a 2 gram diamond, and according to initial estimates, the one found was way less than that..Hmmm…

OK, a frizz happened there. Everybody asking how much that device costed. And I said it was not a matter of price but if one would be able to use it.

OK, during lunch, upon closer examination, the miners started to doubt that rock was really a diamond. One expert took a closer look with a magnifying lens and concluded it was not.

I decided to take the rock home and send it to a lab to have it analyzed. I will do it this week.

Two options here. Either the frequency for diamonds are not precise yet or…Or somehow in the heat of the moment I induced the device. Sincerelly I don’t know.

One thing I can certainly attest. It’s really hard to pinpoint such a small item. One true possibility is that the examiner did point to the right direction, quadrant, etc. But my unsufficient experience in detecting small items cannot be discarded. So what if the diamond detected is stil there and for some reason I got the wrong stone?

Interestingly and amzingly enough is that the examiner swings to that small rock normally here in my home. Coincidence? Inducing? Real micro diamond structures present?

Can’t anser that right now, but I will go after that answer for sure. Just wait.

Also, since the gold frequency has been refined lately and I had 100% success on locating the gold veins, maybe the diamond frequencies may vary from region to region.

I also reported this to RT. Let’s see what their conclusion will be. Also as soon as I get the analysis result I will post it.

Conclusion. The concept of the examiner works. No doubt about it. I detected gold and the diamond concentration spot perfectly. The only issues I had with gold regards shape… Hmmm no big deal . I am sure RT will come up with a solution to that. Regarding the possible misdetection on the diamond, I cannot say much. I wish I had done it one , two or even three more times to see the results I would get, but it was getting late and unfortunately I spent too much time in the gold mining as this was my main concern. Only reserved a day for diamonds as I had a plane to catch and it was a long journey back by car through dusty rocky roads.

So I think I have accomplished my mission. I investigated the examiner claims and although I did not prove it 100% correct on collection of data, it pointed me to the absolutely correct spots where the ‘targets’ where.

I think the next step to take would be to discuss ways of enhancing the equation system for data collection and sharpen the frequencies ie. diamonds. But I really feel you have a great tool in hands. But as with any great tool, it’s imperative you learn how to use it and extensively train with it as it’s no simple task. You can have a ferrari driven by a regular driver or a professional forumula one pilot. That makes a difference for sure.

The current Examiner is Version 8.08B a lot better than any past model. There have been several models since the one tested but the above is a good critique on the Version 7.01B. There are now two diamond frequencies.

Ranger (Anthony]

Click to Page5

Pls tell us if any part e.g. clip on this site is not playing (ranger@Rangertell.cjb.net)

Hit Counter reset 3.4.04